Newsletters

For 2024, the Social Security wage cap will be $168,600, and social security and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits will increase by 3.2 percent. These changes reflect cost-of-living adjustments to account for inflation.

The IRS announced tax relief for individuals and businesses affected by terrorist attacks in the State of Israel. The IRS would continue to monitor events and may provide additional relief.

The IRS announced tax relief for individuals and businesses affected by terrorist attacks in the State of Israel. The IRS would continue to monitor events and may provide additional relief.

Filing and Payment Deadlines Extended

The IRS extended certain deadlines that occurred or would occur during the period from October 7, 2023, through October 7, 2024. As a result, affected individuals and businesses would have until October 7, 2024, to file returns and pay any taxes that were originally due during this period. This extension includes filing for most returns, including:

• individuals who had a valid extension to file their 2022 return due to run out on October 16, 2023. However, because tax payments related to these 2022 returns were due on April 18, 2023, those payments were not eligible for this relief. So, these individuals filing on extension have more time to file, but not to pay;
• calendar-year corporations whose 2022 extensions run out on October 16, 2023. Similarly, these corporations have more time to file, but not to pay;
• 2023 individual and business returns and payments normally due on March 15 and April 15, 2024. These individuals and businesses have both more time to file and more time to pay;
• quarterly estimated income tax payments normally due on January 16, April 15, June 17 and September 16, 2024;
• quarterly payroll and excise tax returns normally due on October 31, 2023, and January 31, April 30 and July 31, 2024;
• calendar-year tax-exempt organizations whose extensions run out on November 15, 2023; and
• retirement plan contributions and rollovers.

The penalty for failure to make payroll and excise tax deposits due on or after October 7, 2023 and before November 6, 2023, would be abated. But the deposits must be made by November 6, 2023.

Notice 2023-71

IR-2023-188

The Internal Revenue Service could release as soon as today the process that businesses can use to withdraw employee retention credit claims.

The Internal Revenue Service could release as soon as today the process that businesses can use to withdraw employee retention credit claims.

The move comes in the wake of the agency announcing that it is halting the processing of new ERC claims until at least the beginning of 2024 and scrutinizing existing claims due to the prevalence of suspected fraudulent claims following a spike in claims in 2023 coupled with the saturation marketing by so-called ERC mills. Thus far, the IRS closer examination of claims has led to thousands already being submitted for auditing.

As part of the heightened scrutiny of claims, the IRS said it would create a process by which businesses would have the ability to withdraw claims before they are processed if they do a more thorough review and determine the claim is not actually a valid claim for the credit that was created as part of the CARES Act to help businesses that may have lost income retain employees during the COVID-19 pandemic.

"I learned this morning that there is going to be an announcement tomorrow [October 19, 2023] on the withdrawal process initiative that the Service is going to be initiating," Linda Azmon, special counsel at the IRS’s Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division, said October 18, 2023, during a session of the American Bar Association’s Virtual 2023 Fall Tax Meeting.

Azmon said that "taxpayers who have not received their claims for refund will be entitled to participate in this process," adding that there is "going to be specific procedures that taxpayers can follow to request their withdrawal of their claims for refund."

She did not provide any specific information on what the process entails, but noted that requesting a withdrawal "means that a taxpayer is requesting that the amended return not be processed at all. And it’s going to be required that the complete return be withdrawn." This is limited to taxpayers who have not had their claim processed, have not received their check or who have the check but have not yet cashed it.

One of the reasons a taxpayer may want to withdraw a claim is "taxpayers have been advised that the only way the Service can recapture claims for refund is through the erroneous refund procedures," she said. "That usually means the service asks for the funds back and if they don’t receive it, the Service asks [the] Department of Justice to bring suit within two years of the payment."

But Azmon points out that taxpayers being told this are being given information that is not entirely correct, as the agency has issued final regulations that allow the IRS to treat an erroneous refund as an underpayment of tax subject to the regular assessment and administrative collections procedures.

"This is a way for the service to recover funds that a taxpayer should have received in an efficient way without the cost of litigation," she said. "And it still provides the administrative processing rights for taxpayers to dispute their claims" without the cost of litigation.

By Gregory Twachtman, Washington News Editor

The Internal Revenue Service detailed how it is proceeding with a pilot program that will allow taxpayers to file their taxes directly on the IRS website as an option along with doing an electronic file or working through a tax professional or other third-party tax preparer.

The IRS released substantial new guidance regarding the new clean vehicle credit and the used clean vehicle credit. The guidance updates procedures for manufacturer, dealer and seller registrations and written reports; and provides detailed rules for a taxpayer’s election to transfer a credit to the dealer after 2023. The guidance includes:

The IRS released substantial new guidance regarding the new clean vehicle credit and the used clean vehicle credit. The guidance updates procedures for manufacturer, dealer and seller registrations and written reports; and provides detailed rules for a taxpayer’s election to transfer a credit to the dealer after 2023. The guidance includes:

• -- Rev. Proc. 2023-33, which is scheduled to be published on October 23, 2023, in I.R.B. 2023-43;
• -- NPRM REG-113064-23, which is scheduled to published in the Federal Register on October 10, 2023; and
• -- IRS Fact Sheet FS-2023-22, which updates the IRS Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) for the clean vehicle credits.

The proposed regs are generally proposed to apply to tax years beginning after they are published in the Federal Register. However, the proposed regs for transferring credits to dealers are proposed to apply beginning on January 1, 2024, which is when the transfer election becomes available. Proposed regs for treating the omission of a correct vehicle identification number (VIN) as a mathematical or clerical error would also apply to the Code Sec. 45W clean commercial vehicle credit. They are proposed to apply to tax years beginning after December 31, 2023.

Comments are requested. Rev. Proc. 2022-42 is superseded in part.

Proposed Regs for the Clean Vehicle Credits

For purposes of the new clean vehicle credit, the used clean vehicle credit, and the commercial clean vehicle credit, the proposed regs would treat a taxpayer as having omitted the required correct vehicle identification number (VIN) for the vehicle if the VIN is missing from the taxpayer’s return or the number reported on the return is an invalid VIN. An invalid VIN is a number that does not match any existing VIN reported by a qualified manufacturer. A taxpayer would also be treated as omitting the VIN if the provided VIN is not for a qualified vehicle for the year the credit is claimed.

With respect to the new clean vehicle credit and the used clean vehicle credit, the proposed regs would clarify that taxpayer must file an income tax return for the year the clean vehicle is placed in service, including a Form 8936, Clean Vehicle Credits. The taxpayer is treated as having omitted the vehicle’s correct VIN if the VIN on the taxpayer’s return does not match the VIN in the seller’s report. In addition, a dealer under the proposed regs would not include persons licensed solely by a U.S. territory. To facilitate direct-to-consumer sales, a dealer generally could make sales outside the jurisdiction where it is licensed; however, it could not make sales at sites outside its own jurisdiction.

New Rules for Used Clean Vehicle Credit

The proposed regs would clarify that a vehicle’s eligibility for the used vehicle credit is not affected by a title that indicates it has been damaged or an otherwise a branded title. In addition, the used vehicle credit could not be divided among multiple owners of a single vehicle. With respect to the MAGI limit for eligible taxpayers, if the taxpayer's filing status for the tax year differs from the taxpayer's filing status in the preceding tax year, the taxpayer would satisfy the limit if MAGI does not exceed the threshold amount in either year based on the applicable filing status for that tax year. These last two rules are consistent with earlier proposed regs for the new clean vehicle credit.

The proposed regs would provide a first transfer rule, under which a qualified sale must be the first transfer of the previously-owned clean vehicle since August 16, 2022, as shown by the vehicle history of such vehicle, after the sale to the original owner. The rule would ignore transfers between dealers. The taxpayer generally could rely on the dealer’s representation of the vehicle history; however, taxpayers would also be encouraged to independently examine the vehicle history to confirm whether the first transfer rule is satisfied.

Under the proposed regs, a used vehicle’s sale price would include delivery charges, as well as fees and charges imposed by the dealer. The sale price it would not include separately-stated taxes and fees required by law, separate financing, extended warranties, insurance or maintenance service charges.

Cancellation of Sale, Return of Clean Vehicle, and Resale of Clean Vehicle

The proposed regs would clarify that a taxpayer cannot claim a clean vehicle credit if the sale is canceled before the taxpayer places th vehicle in service (that is, before the taxpayer takes delivery). The credits also would not be available if the taxpayer returns the vehicle within 30 days after placing it in service. A returned new clean vehicle would no longer qualify as a new clean vehicle. However, a returned used clean vehicle could continue to qualify for the credit if the vehicle history does not reflect the sale and return. A vehicle’s return would nullify any election the taxpayer made to transfer the credit for the vehicle.

Under the proposed regs, a taxpayer acquires a clean vehicle for resale if the resale occurs withing 30 days after the taxpayer places the vehicle in service. The resold vehicle would not qualify for either credit. If the taxpayer elected to transfer the credit, the election remains valid after the resale; thus, the credit is recaptured from the taxpayer, not from the dealer.

Taxpayers returning or reselling a clean vehicle more than 30 days after the date the taxpayer placed it in service would generally remain eligible for the applicable clean vehicle credit for purchasing the vehicle. Any election to transfer the taxpayer’s credit to the dealer also remains in effect. The returned or resold vehicle would not remain eligible for either credit. However, the IRS could disallow the credit if, based on the facts and circumstances, it determines that the taxpayer purchased the vehicle with the intent to resell or return it

Taxpayer's Election to Transfer Clean Vehicle Credit to Dealer

A taxpayer that elects to transfer a credit to a registered dealer must transfer the entire amount of the allowable credit. Each taxpayer may transfer a total of two credits per year (either two new clean vehicle credits, or one new clean vehicle credit and one used clean vehicle credit). This is the case even if married taxpayers file a joint return. A transfer election is irrevocable.

Under the proposed regs, the amount of a clean vehicle credit an electing taxpayer could transfer could exceed the electing taxpayer’s regular tax liability; and the amount of a transferred credit would not be subject to recapture merely because it exceeds the taxpayer’s tax liability. The dealer’s payment for the transferred credit, whether in cash or as a partial payment or down payment for the vehicle, is not includible in the electing taxpayer’s gross income. To ensure that the credit properly reduces the taxpayer’s basis in the vehicle, the electing taxpayer is treated as repaying the payment to the dealer as part of the purchase price of the vehicle.

Both the electing taxpayer and the dealer must make detailed disclosures and attestations. Some of these disclosures must be made to the other party, and some must be made through the IRS Energy Credits Online Portal. All must be made no later than the time of the sale. A taxpayer cannot transfer any portion of the new clean vehicle credit that is treated as part of the general business credit.

A seller or a registered dealer must retain records of transferred credits for at least three years after the taxpayer makes the credit transfer election or a seller files its report for the sale.

Manufacturer, Dealer and Seller Registration and Report Requirements

Clean vehicle manufacturers, sellers and dealers must register through an IRS Energy Credits Online Portal that should be available on the IRS website later this month. A representative of the manufacturer, seller or dealer will have to create or sign into an account on irs.gov. Registration help is available at www.irs.gov/registerhelp. Manufacturers, sellers and dealers may check IRS.gov/cleanvehicles for updates.

Taxpayers and sellers may rely on information and certifications by a qualified manufacturer providing that a vehicle is eligible for the new clean vehicle credit or the used clean vehicle credit. However, this reliance is limited to information regarding the vehicle’s eligibility for the applicable credit.

Rev. Proc. 2023-33 details the required registration information for sellers and dealers. The IRS will confirm the information or notify the seller or dealer that it has been unable to do so. If the IRS accepts a dealer registration, it will issue a unique dealer identification number. If the IRS rejects the registration, the dealer may request administrative review.

s for a qualified manufacturer’s written agreement with and a dealer’s written reports to the IRS before January 1, 2024, manufacturers and sellers may still use the procedures described in Rev. Proc. 2022-42. However, as of January 1, 2024, qualified manufacturers must have entered into written agreements with the IRS via the IRS Energy Credits Online Portal, even if they previously registered and filed written agreements under Rev. Proc. 2022-42. Also as of January 1, 2024, qualified manufacturers and sellers must use the Portal to file their required reports to the IRS.

A seller must file its report within three calendar days of the sale, and provide a copy to the taxpayer within another three days. If the information in the report does not match information in IRS records, the IRS may reject the report and notify the seller. The seller must notify the buyer within three calendar days. If the IRS rejects a seller report, a dealer will not be eligible for advance credit payments. A seller must also use the Portal to update or rescind information for a scrivener’s error or the cancellation of a sale as promptly as possible (the seller must also file a new report noting the return of a vehicle). The seller must notify the buyer within three calendar days and provide a copy of the updated or rescinded report.

Advance Credit Payments to Dealers

When a buyer elects to transfer a clean vehicle credit to a dealer, the advance credit program allows the dealer to receive payment of the credit before the dealer files its tax return. The proposed regs would clarify that the advance payments are not included in the dealer’s income and they may exceed the dealer’s tax liability. The dealer cannot deduct the payment made to the electing taxpayer. The advance payment is included in the amount realized by the dealer on the sale of the clean vehicle. If the dealer is a partnership or an S corporation, the advance payment is not treated as exempt income.

To receive advance credit payments, the registered dealer must be an eligible entity under the proposed regs. An eligible entity is a registered dealer that submits additional registration information and is in dealer tax compliance. The IRS will conduct dealer tax compliance checks before disbursing an advance credit payment, and also on a continuing and regular basis.

Dealer tax compliance means that, for all tax periods during the most recent five tax years, the dealer has filed all of its required federal information and tax returns, including for federal income and employment tax; and paid all federal tax, penalties, and interest due at the time of sale (or is current on its obligations under any installment agreement with the IRS). The dealer must also retain information related to the vehicle sale or credit transfer for at least three years. A dealer that does not satisfy this test may still be a registered dealer, but it cannot be an eligible entity until the tax compliance issue is resolved.

The dealer that receives the transferred credit must provide the qualified vehicle’s VIN, the seller report, and the required taxpayer disclosure information through the IRS Energy Credits Online Portal. The IRS will disburse advance payments of the credits only through electronic payments; it will not issue any paper checks.

The IRS may suspend a registered dealer’s eligibility to participate in the advance payment program for sever reasons, including the provision of inaccurate information regarding eligible for the credit; failure to satisfy dealer tax compliance requirements; and failure to properly use the IRS Energy Credits Online Portal. The IRS will notify the dealer of its suspension, and give the dealer an opportunity correct the errors. If a suspended dealer does not correct the errors withing one year, the IRS will revoke its registration.

The IRS may also revoke a dealer’s registration to receive transferred credits and its eligibility for the advance payment program for failure to comply with the registration or tax compliance requirements, for losing its dealer license, for providing inaccurate information, for failing to retain required records for three years, or if it is suspended three times in the preceding year. The IRS will notify the dealer within 30 days of its decision to revoke eligibility for the advance payment program, and the dealer may request administrative review of the decision. The dealer may re-register after one year, but will be permanently barred after three revocations.

The proposed regs would provide that a dealer could not administratively appeal the IRS’s decisions relating to the suspension or revocation of a dealer’s registration unless the IRS and the IRS Independent Office of Appeals agree that such review is available and the IRS provides the time and manner for the review.

Comments Requested

The IRS requests comments on the proposed regs. Comments and requests for a public hearing must be received by December 11, 2023. They may be mailed to the IRS, or submitted electronically via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov (indicate IRS and REG-113064-23).

Effect on Other Documents

Rev. Proc. 2023-33 supersedes in part Rev. Proc. 2022-42, I.R.B. 2022-52 , 565.

Proposed Regulations, NPRM REG-113064-23

Rev. Proc. 2023-33

FS-2023-22

IR-2023-186

The IRS has released the 2023-2024 special per diem rates. Taxpayers use the per diem rates to substantiate certain expenses incurred while traveling away from home. These special per diem rates include:

The IRS has released the 2023-2024 special per diem rates. Taxpayers use the per diem rates to substantiate certain expenses incurred while traveling away from home. These special per diem rates include:

• 1. the special transportation industry meal and incidental expenses (M&IE) rates,
• 2. the rate for the incidental expenses only deduction,
• 3. and the rates and list of high-cost localities for purposes of the high-low substantiation method.

Transportation Industry Special Per Diem Rates

The special M&IE rates for taxpayers in the transportation industry are:

• $69 for any locality of travel in the continental United States (CONUS), and
• $74 for any locality of travel outside the continental United States (OCONUS).

Incidental Expenses Only Rate

The rate is $5 per day for any CONUS or OCONUS travel for the incidental expenses only deduction.

High-Low Substantiation Method

For purposes of the high-low substantiation method, the 2023-2024 special per diem rates are:

• $309 for travel to any high-cost locality, and
• $214 for travel to any other locality within CONUS.

The amount treated as paid for meals is:

• $74 for travel to any high-cost locality, and
• $64 for travel to any other locality within CONUS

Instead of the meal and incidental expenses only substantiation method, taxpayers may use:

• $74 for travel to any high-cost locality, and
• $64 for travel to any other locality within CONUS.

Taxpayers using the high-low method must comply with Rev. Proc. 2019-48, I.R.B. 2019-51, 1390. That procedure provides the rules for using a per diem rate to substantiate the amount of ordinary and necessary business expenses paid or incurred while traveling away from home.

The IRS provided guidance on the new energy efficient home credit, as amended by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (P.L. 117-169). The guidance largely reiterates the statutory requirements for the credit, but it provides some new details regarding definitions, certifications and substantiation.

The IRS provided guidance on the new energy efficient home credit, as amended by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (P.L. 117-169). The guidance largely reiterates the statutory requirements for the credit, but it provides some new details regarding definitions, certifications and substantiation.

Definitions

For purposes of the requirement that a home must be acquired from an eligible contractor, a home leased from the contractor for use as a residence is considered acquired from the contractor. However, a home the contractor retains for use as a residence is not acquired from the contractor. A manufactured home may be acquired directly from the contractor, or indirectly from an intermediary that acquired it from the contractor and then sold or leased it to a buyer for use as a residence, or to intervening intermediaries that eventually sold it to a buyer for use as a residence.

For a constructed home, the eligible contractor is the person that built and owned the home and had a basis in it during its construction. For a manufactured home, the eligible contractor is the person that produced the home and owned and had a basis in it during its production.

The United States includes only the states and the District of Columbia.

Certifications

A dwelling unit that is certified under the applicable Energy Star program is considered to meet the program requirements for purposes of the credit. Similarly, a dwelling unit that is certified under the Zero Energy Ready Home (ZERH) program is deemed to meet the requirements for the credit for a ZERH. The ZERH program in effect for purposes of the credit is the one in effect as of the date identified on the Department of Energy’s ZERH webpage at https://www.energy.gov/eere/buildings/doe-zero-energy-ready-home-zerh-program-requirements.

The eligible contractor must obtain the appropriate Energy Star or ZERH certification before claiming the credit. The contractor should keep the certification with its tax records, but does not have to file it with the return that claims the credit.

Rules for homes acquired before 2023, under which eligible certifiers could certify a home and contractors could use approved software to calculate a new home’s energy consumption, do not apply to a home acquired after 2022.

Substantiation

To substantiate the credit, the contractor must retain in its tax records, at a minimum, the home's Energy Star or ZERH certification, including its date; and records sufficient to establish:

1. the address of the qualified home and its location in the United States;
2. the taxpayer’s status as an eligible contractor;
3. the acquisition of the home from the taxpayer for use as a residence, including the name of the person who acquired it; and
4. if applicable, proof that the prevailing wage requirements were met.

However, for a manufactured home the contractor sells to a dealer, a safe harbor allows the contractor to rely on a statement by the dealer to establish the date the home was acquired, its location in the United States, and its acquisition for use as a residence. The statement must:

1. Specify the date of the retail sale of the manufactured home, state that the dealer delivered it to the purchaser at an address in the United States, and provide that the dealer has no knowledge of any information suggesting that the purchaser will use the manufactured home other than as a residence;
2. Provide the name, address and telephone number of the dealer and any intervening intermediaries; and
3. Declare, under penalties of perjury, that the dealer statement and any accompanying documents are true, correct and complete.

Effect on Other Documents

Notice 2008-35, 2008-1 CB 647, and Notice 2008-36, 2008-1 CB 650, are obsoleted for qualified homes acquired after December 31, 2022.

The IRS identified drought-stricken areas where tax relief is available to taxpayers that sold or exchanged livestock because of drought. The relief extends the deadlines for taxpayers to replace the livestock and avoid reporting gain on the sales. These extensions apply until the drought-stricken area has a drought-free year.

The IRS identified drought-stricken areas where tax relief is available to taxpayers that sold or exchanged livestock because of drought. The relief extends the deadlines for taxpayers to replace the livestock and avoid reporting gain on the sales. These extensions apply until the drought-stricken area has a drought-free year.

When Sales of Livestock are Involuntary Conversions

Sales of livestock due to drought are involuntary conversions of property. Taxpayers can postpone gain on involuntary conversions if they buy qualified replacement property during the replacement period. Qualified replacement property must be similar or related in service or use to the converted property.

Usually, the replacement period ends two years after the tax year in which the involuntary conversion occurs. However, a longer replacement period applies in several situations, such as when sales occur in a drought-stricken area.

Livestock Sold Because of Weather

Taxpayers have four years to replace livestock they sold or exchanged solely because of drought, flood, or other weather condition. Three conditions apply.

First, the livestock cannot be raised for slaughter, held for sporting purposes or be poultry.

Second, the taxpayer must have held the converted livestock for:

• draft,
• dairy, or
• breeeding purposes.

Third, the weather condition must make the area eligible for federal assistance.

Persistent Drought

The IRS extends the four-year replacement period when a taxpayer sells or exchanges livestock due to persistent drought. The extension continues until the taxpayer’s region experiences a drought-free year.

The first drought-free year is the first 12-month period that:

• ends on August 31 in or after the last year of the four-year replacement period, and
• does not include any weekly period of drought.

What Areas are Suffering from Drought

The National Drought Mitigation Center produces weekly Drought Monitor maps that report drought-stricken areas. Taxpayers can view these maps at

http://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/Maps/MapArchive.aspx

However, the IRS also provided a list of areas where the year ending on August 31, 2023, was not a drought-free year. The replacement period in these areas will continue until the area has a drought-free year.

With the Internal Revenue Service announcing more details on how it will be targeting America’s wealthiest taxpayers, Kostelanetz’s Megan Brackney offered up some advice on preparing for increased compliance activity.

With the Internal Revenue Service announcing more details on how it will be targeting America’s wealthiest taxpayers, Kostelanetz’s Megan Brackney offered up some advice on preparing for increased compliance activity.

The first step, especially for those that fall within the agency’s announced parameters for who is being targeted, is to review recent tax filings. The agency announced in September it would be targeting large partnerships.

"I would say to look back over the last three years because that’s the typical statute of limitations period for the IRS to audit and assess, maybe look back even a little bit longer," Brackney, partner at the law firm, said in an interview.

In particular, she recommended a focus on major financial transactions.

"Look at significant transactions and make sure that you have all the substantiation because a lot of times, the issue isn’t so much a legal question or anything to complex," she continued. "It’s just whether or not you know [for example if] the partnership sold an asset, do they actually have records that substantiate their basis?"

Brackney expects that after the agency completes its work on the largest partnerships, it will continue this kind of compliance work on those high earning partnerships that may be outside of the original targeted thresholds.

Other things to start thinking about if you are a large partnership is how you plan to respond to an audit if you end up targeted for enforcement action by the IRS, especially if you have significant transactions that might draw extra scrutiny. Some questions to ponder are whether you have the in-house expertise to handle an audit or if you plan on going to an outside source.

"Nobody is going to do those things until they are actually audited, but its good to start thinking about it and planning it," she said. "And if you do have a really significant transaction, maybe go ahead and have someone take a look at it already to make sure it is properly documented."

She also suggested that if a partnership finds an error as they look back on their own to go ahead and correct it with the IRS before the agency "is poking around and looking at it."

Training Concerns

And while the IRS is moving forward with its plans to audit high earning partnerships, Brackney expressed some concerns relative to agent training.

She recalled a few years ago when the IRS announced global high net worth audits program that ended up collecting very little.

"Most of those audits resulted in no change letters," Brackney said, "which is wild because you audit a normal middle-class taxpayer with a Schedule C business, you are going to have a change [and] not because anybody is trying to cheat. There is going to be something that they can’t substantiate."

She said it was hard to understand how most of the global high net worth audits had no changes, and expressed some concerns that this could happen again, but is hopeful that with the agency’s supplemental funding from the Inflation Reduction Act will come proper training to handle the complexities of reviewing these tax returns.

"I support the IRS being fully funded," she said. "It’s good for tax administration and it makes a fairer society because it’s not like people are just getting away with stuff because the IRS doesn’t have the resources."

By Gregory Twachtman, Washington News Editor

The IRS has cautioned taxpayers to be vigilant about promotions involving exaggerated art donation deductions that may target high-income individuals and has also provided valuable tips to help people steer clear of falling into such schemes. Taxpayers can legitimately claim art donations, but dishonest promoters may employ direct solicitation to make unrealistically promising offers. In a bid to boost compliance and protect taxpayers from scams, the IRS has active promoter investigations and taxpayer audits underway in this area.

The IRS has cautioned taxpayers to be vigilant about promotions involving exaggerated art donation deductions that may target high-income individuals and has also provided valuable tips to help people steer clear of falling into such schemes. Taxpayers can legitimately claim art donations, but dishonest promoters may employ direct solicitation to make unrealistically promising offers. In a bid to boost compliance and protect taxpayers from scams, the IRS has active promoter investigations and taxpayer audits underway in this area.

Also, the IRS has employed various compliance tools, including tax return audits and civil penalty investigations, to combat abusive art donations. Taxpayers, especially high-income individuals, are advised to watch out for aggressive promotions. Additionally, following Inflation Reduction Act funding the IRS has intensified the efforts to ensure accurate tax payments from high-income and high-wealth individuals.

The Service has advised taxpayers to watch-out for the following red flags:

• Be wary of purchasing multiple works by the same artist with little market value beyond what promoters claim.
• Watch for specific appraisers arranged by promoters, as their appraisals often lack crucial details.
• Taxpayers are responsible for accurate tax reporting, and engaging in tax avoidance schemes can lead to penalties, interest, fines, and even imprisonment.
• Charities should also be cautious not to inadvertently support these schemes.

In order to to properly claim a charitable contribution deduction for an art donation, a taxpayer must keep records to prove:

• Name and address of the charitable organization that received the art.
• Date and location of the contribution.
• Detailed description of the donated art.

Also, The IRS has a team of trained appraisers in Art Appraisal Services who provide assistance and advice to the IRS and taxpayers on valuation questions in connection with personal property and works of art.

Finally, the taxpayers can report tax-related illegal activities relating to charitable contributions of art using:

• Form 14242, Report Suspected Abusive Tax Promotions or Preparers, to report a suspected abusive tax avoidance scheme and tax return preparers who promote such schemes.
• They should also report fraud to the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration at 800-366-4484.

Your 2011 tax return has been filed, or you have properly filed for an extension. In either case, now it’s time to start thinking about important post-filing season activities to save you tax in 2012 and beyond.  A few loose ends may pay dividends if you take care of them sooner instead of later.

Successful filing season

The IRS reported that the 2012 filing season moved along without significant problems. The IRS continued to upgrade its return processing programs and systems.  Early in the filing season, some filers experienced a short delay in receiving refunds but the delay was quickly resolved.  The IRS reported just before the end of the filing season that it had processed nearly 100 million returns and issued 75 million refunds. 

Extensions

Individuals are eligible for an automatic six-month extension until October 15 to file a return. To get the extension, taxpayers must estimate their tax liability and pay any amount due.  When a taxpayer properly files for an extension, he or she avoids the late-filing penalty, generally five percent per month based on the unpaid balance, which applies to returns filed after the April 17 deadline. Any payment made with an extension request will reduce or eliminate interest and late-payment penalties that apply to payments made after April 17. The current interest rate is three percent per year, compounded daily, and the late-payment penalty is normally 0.5 percent per month.

Installment agreements

Installment agreements generally can be set up quickly with the IRS and help to spread out payments to make them more manageable.  In 2012, the IRS increased the threshold for a streamlined installment agreement from $25,000 to $50,000. Installment agreements however, come with some costs.  The IRS charges a fee to set up an installment agreement.  If you cannot pay the full amount within 120 days, the fee for setting up an agreement is:

• $52 for a direct debit agreement;
• $105 for a standard agreement or payroll deduction agreement; or
• $43 for qualified lower income taxpayers.

It’s important to make your scheduled payments timely and in full. The IRS expects you to pay the minimum amount agreed on; you can always pay more if you are able.  If your installment agreement goes into default, the IRS can charge a reinstatement fee.

An installment agreement does not reduce the amount of the taxes, interest, or penalties owed, and penalties and interest will continue to accrue. In determining the amount of the penalty for failure to pay tax, the penalty is reduced from 0.5 percent per month to 0.25 percent per month during any month that an installment agreement for the unpaid tax is in effect.

You must specify the amount you can pay and the day of the month (1st-28th) on which you wish to make your payment each month. The IRS expects to receive your payment on the date you select. The IRS will respond to your request, usually within 30 days, to advise you as to whether your request has been approved or denied, or if more information is needed.

Amended returns

Taxpayers can file an amended return if they find an error, uncover unreported income or discover an item that will generate a deduction. Amended returns are filed on Use Form 1040X, Amended U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, to correct a previously filed Form 1040, Form 1040A, Form 1040EZ, Form 1040NR, or Form 1040NR-EZ. If you are filing to claim an additional refund, wait until you have received your original refund. If you owe additional tax for a tax year for which the filing date has not passed, file Form 1040X and pay the tax by the filing date for that year to avoid penalties and interest. 

Generally, to claim a refund, Form 1040X must be filed within 3 years from the date of your original return or within two years from the date you paid the tax, whichever is later. Returns filed before the due date (without regard to extensions) are considered filed on the due date. Taxpayers must file a separate Form 1040X for each year they are amending.

Targeted penalty relief

This year – for the first time – the IRS offered penalty relief to qualified individuals who were unable to pay their taxes by the April 17 deadline. Unemployed filers and self-employed individuals whose business income dropped substantially can apply for a six-month extension of time to pay, the IRS explained. Eligible taxpayers will not be charged a late-payment penalty if they pay any tax, penalty and interest due by October 15, 2012. Taxpayers qualify if they were unemployed for any 30-day period between January 1, 2011 and April 17, 2012. Self-employed people qualify if their business income declined 25 percent or more in 2011, due to the economy.  However, income limits apply, which excluded many taxpayers from the program.

Records

The IRS advises that taxpayers maintain tax records for three years.  In many cases, especially for individuals with complex returns, records should be kept longer. Our office maintains taxpayer records with the utmost care and confidentiality.

We encourage you to contact us if you have any questions about the end of the 2011 filing season and how your 2011 return can provide a roadmap to tax savings in 2012.

After three days of oral arguments in March, the Supreme Court is deciding the fate of the Pension Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) and its companion law, the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (HCERA).  Not only do the new laws impact health care, they contain numerous tax provisions, many of which have yet to take effect.  The Supreme Court may uphold the laws, strike them down in whole or in part, or decide that the case is premature.  The Supreme Court is expected to render its decision in June.  In the meantime, a quick checklist of the tax provisions in the two laws reveals how extensively they impact individuals, businesses and taxpayers of all types.

Challenges

Congress passed, and President Obama signed, the PPACA and HCERA in 2010.  Almost immediately, several states and taxpayers challenged the laws in court.  The lawsuits generally argued that Congress had exceeded its authority by requiring individuals to obtain health insurance.

The cases made their way from federal district courts to the various federal courts of appeal, which reached different conclusions.  One circuit court invalidated the individual mandate; two circuit courts upheld the individual mandate and another circuit court dismissed the challenge on procedural grounds.

Supreme Court grants review

On November 14, 2011, the United States Supreme Court agreed to review the Eleventh Circuit Court’s decision in Florida v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.  The Supreme Court stated it would examine four issues: (1) the Constitutionality of the individual mandate; (2) whether the individual mandate is severable from the PPACA; (3) whether the challenge to the individual mandate is barred by the Anti-Injunction Act^; and (4) whether PPACA’s expansion of Medicaid exceeded Congress's authority. The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case on March 26-28 in Washington, D.C. 

Individual mandate and penalty

The individual mandate generally requires individuals to maintain minimum essential coverage for themselves and their dependents after 2013. Individuals will be required to pay a penalty for each month of noncompliance, unless they are exempt (such as individuals covered by Medicaid and Medicare).  The PPACA also provides tax incentives to help individuals obtain minimum essential coverage.  Beginning in 2014, individuals with incomes within certain federal poverty thresholds may qualify for a refundable health insurance premium assistance tax credit.  The PPACA also provides for advance payment of the credit.

In Florida v. HHS, the Eleventh Circuit struck down the individual health insurance mandate but did not declare the entire PPACA unconstitutional.  In contrast, the Sixth Circuit held that the individual mandate was a valid exercise of Congress’ power to regulate commerce (Thomas More Law Center v. Obama).  The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit also upheld the individual mandate (Mead v. Holder).  The Supreme Court could find the entire PPACA unconstitutional or could find that the individual mandate is severable, thereby preserving other parts of the statute, including various tax provisions.

Tax provisions

While much attention has focused on the individual mandate, the Supreme Court may also decide the fate of many tax provisions in the PPACA and the HCERA. Among the tax provisions potentially affected by the Supreme Court’s decision are:

• Code Sec. 45R small employer health insurance tax credit;

• 3.8 percent Medicare contribution tax on unearned income for higher income taxpayers after 2012;

• Additional 0.9 percent Medicare tax on wages and self-employment income of higher income taxpayers after 2012;

• Increased itemized deduction for unreimbursed medical expenses after 2012;

• Prohibition on over-the-counter medicines being eligible for health flexible spending arrangement (FSA), health reimbursement arrangement (HRA), health savings account (HSA), and Archer Medical Savings Account (MSA) dollars.

• Additional tax on distributions from HSAs and Archer MSAs not used for qualified medical expenses;

• Excise tax on high-dollar health plans after 2017;

• Tax credit for therapeutic discovery projects;

• Annual fees on manufacturers and importers of branded prescription drugs;

• Reporting of employer-provided health coverage on Form W-2;

• Codification of the economic substance doctrine.

Anti-Injunction Act

The Supreme Court could decide that the challenge to the PPACA is premature.  Under the Anti-Injunction Act, a taxpayer must wait to oppose a tax until after it is collected.  The PPACA’s individual mandate and its related penalty do not take effect until 2014.  The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals found that the penalty amounted to a tax and taxpayers could not challenge the tax until it took effect (Liberty University v. Geithner).

If you have any questions about the tax provisions in the health care reform laws, please contact our office. We will be following developments as they ensue after the Supreme Court issues its decision in June.

Proposals to reform retirement savings plans were highlighted during an April 2012 hearing by the House Ways and Means Committee.  Lawmakers were advised by many experts to move slowly on making changes to current retirement programs that might discourage employers from sponsoring plans for their workers.  Nevertheless, it is clear that Congress wants to make some bold moves in the retirement savings area of the tax law and that likely it will do so under the broader umbrella of general “tax reform.” While tax reform is gaining momentum, it is unlikely to produce any change in the tax laws until 2013 or 2014. Considering that retirement planning necessarily looks long-term into the future, however, now is not too soon to pay some attention to the proposals being discussed.

Testimony

The Chief of Actuarial Issues and Director of Retirement Policy for the American Society of Pension Professionals and Actuaries testified that current federal tax incentives can transform taxable bonuses for business owners into retirement savings contributions that benefit both owners and employees. “This incentive for the business owner to contribute for other employees results in a distribution of tax benefit that is more progressive than the current income tax structure," she observed.

An American Benefits Council representation warned at the hearing that the wisest course for lawmakers is to not enact new laws that would disrupt the success of the current system. Short-term retirement legislation designed to boost tax revenues generally do so by eliminating the existing savings incentives and eroding the amount that workers actually save.

Committee Chairman Dave Camp, R-Mich. questioned whether the large number of retirement plans now existing with their different rules and eligibility criteria leads to confusion, reducing the effectiveness of the incentives in increasing retirement savings. Ranking member Sander Levin, D-Mich., questioned the value of making tax reform-inspired changes to retirement plans. "Tax reform should approach retirement savings incentives with an eye toward strengthening our current system and expanding participation, not as an opportunity to find revenue," Levin said.

JCT report

In advance of the hearing, the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) summarized the tax treatment of current-law retirement savings plans and described some recent reform proposals in a report, “Present Law and Background Relating to the Tax Treatment of Retirement Savings” (JCX-32-12). The report highlighted several of the recent proposals on retirement savings:

Automatic enrollment payroll deduction IRA.  President Obama has proposed mandatory automatic enrollment payroll deduction IRA programs.  An employer that does not sponsor a qualified retirement plan, SEP, or SIMPLE IRA plan for its employees (or sponsors a plan and excludes some employees) would be required to offer an automatic enrollment payroll deduction IRA program with a default contribution to a Roth IRA of three percent of compensation. An employer would not be required to offer the program if the employer has been in existence less than two years or has 10 or fewer employees.

Expand the saver's credit.  The Administration has also proposed to make the retirement savings contribution credit, known as the saver's credit, fully refundable and for the saver’s credit to be deposited automatically in an employer-sponsored retirement plan account or IRA to which the eligible individual contributes. In addition, in place of the current credit ranging from 10 percent to 50 percent for qualified retirement savings contributions up to $2,000 per individual, the proposal would provide a credit of 50 percent of such contributions up to $500 (indexed for inflation) per individual.

Consolidate plans.  The JCT also reviewed two retirement proposals from the Bush administration:  Consolidating traditional and Roth IRAs into a single type of account called Retirement Savings Accounts (RSAs) and creating Lifetime Savings Accounts (LSAs) that could be used to save for any purpose with an annual limit for contributions of $2,000. The JCT explained that the tax treatment of RSAs and LSAs would be similar to the current tax treatment of Roth IRAs (contributions would not be deductible, and earnings on contributions generally would not be taxable when distributed). Additionally, the Bush Administration had proposed to consolidate various current-law employer-sponsored retirement arrangements under which individual accounts are maintained for employees and under which employees may make contributions into a single type of arrangement called an employer retirement savings account (ERSA).

The American Society of Pension Professionals and Actuaries (ASPPA) told the Ways and Means Committee that the large number of plans with different rules and criteria does not reduce the effectiveness of the incentives in increasing retirement savings. ”Consolidating all types of defined-contribution type plans into one type of plan would not be simplification,” the ASPPA cautioned. “It would disrupt savings, and force state and local governments and nonprofits to modify their retirement savings plans and procedures.”

As an individual or business, it is your responsibility to be aware of and to meet your tax filing/reporting deadlines. This calendar summarizes important tax reporting and filing data for individuals, businesses and other taxpayers for the month of May 2012.

May 2

Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates April 25–27.

May 4

Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates April 28–May 1.

May 9

Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates May 2–4.

May 10

Employees who work for tips. Employees who received $20 or more in tips during April must report them to their employer using Form 4070.

May 11

Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates May 5–8.

May 16

Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates May 9–11.

May 18

Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates May 12–15.

May 23

Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates May 16–18.

May 25

Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates May 19–22.

May 31

Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates May 23–25.

June 1

Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates May 26–29.

The just-released 2011 IRS Data Book provides statistical information on IRS examinations, collections and other activities for the most recent fiscal year ended in 2011. The 2011 Data Book statistics, when compared to the 2010 version, shows, among other things, a notable increase in the odds of being audited within several high-income categories.

Individual audits

Individual taxpayers collectively were audited at a 1.1% rate over the FY 2011 period, based on 1,564,690 audited returns out of the 140,837,499 returns that were filed. While this rate is about the same as in 2010, variations occurred within the income ranges. An uptick was particularly noticeable in the upper brackets (see statistics, below).

Both correspondence and field audits were counted within the statistics. Correspondence audits accounted for 75% of all audits for FY 2011 (down from 77.1% in FY 2010), while audits conducted face-to-face by revenue agents were only 25% of the total, albeit representing an increase from the 21.7% level in FY 2010. Business returns and higher-income individuals are more likely to experience an audit by a revenue agent; while correspondence audits are generally single-issue audits, a revenue agent is likely to explore other issues "while he or she is there."

Examination coverage: individuals

The following audit statistics taken from the FY 2011 Data Book (and contrasted with FY 2010 Data Book stats) show an increase in the audit rate especially in proportion to adjusted gross income (AGI) level:

• No AGI: 3.42% (3.19% in 2010)
• Under $25K: 1.22% (1.18% in 2010)
• $25K-$50K: 0.73% (0.73% in 2010)
• $50K-$75K: 0.83% (0.78% in 2010)
• $75K-$100K: 0.82% (0.64% in 2010)
• $100K-$200K: 1.00% (0.71% in 2010)
• $200K-$500K: 2.66% (1.92% in 2010)
• $500K-$1M: 5.38% (3.37% in 2010)
• $1M-$5M: 11.80% (6.67% in 2010)
• $5M-$10M: 20.75% (11.55% in 2010)
• $10M and over: 29.93% (18.38% in 2010)

Examination coverage: business returns

For individual income tax returns that include business income (other than farm returns), the 2011 audit rate statistics based upon business income (total gross receipts) reveals the IRS's recognition that audits of small business returns yield proportionately higher deficiency amounts:

• Gross receipts under $25K: 1.3% (1.2% in 2010)
• Gross receipts $25K to $100K: 2.9% (2.5% in 2010)
• Gross receipts $100K to $200K: 4.3% (4.7% in 2010)
• Gross receipts over $200K: 3.8% (3.3% in 2010)

The difference in audit rates between returns with and without business income, as measured by total positive income of at least $200K and under $1M provide further evidence of the IRS's tendency toward auditing business returns: 3.6% for returns with business income versus 3.2% without in FY 2011 (2.9% versus 2.5% in FY 2010).

Corporate/other returns

The audit rates for corporations are consistent with the deficiency experience that the IRS has had examining corporations of varying sizes. Some selected audit rates include:

• For small corporations showing total assets of $250K to $1M, the audit rate for FY 2011 was 1.6% (1.4% in 2010); $1M to $5 million, the rate was 1.9% (1.7% in 2010), and for $5M to $10M, the rate was 2.6% (3% in 2010).
• For larger corporations showing total assets of $10M-$50M, the audit rate was 13.3% (13.4% in 2010) in contrast to those at the top end with total assets from $5B to $20B (50.5% (45.3% in 2010)).
• For S corporations and partnerships, the overall audit rate was 0.4% (same as in 2010), in contrast to an overall 1.5% rate for corporations (1.4% in 2010).

Everybody knows that tax deductions aren't allowed without proof in the form of documentation. What records are needed to "prove it" to the IRS vary depending upon the type of deduction that you may want to claim. Some documentation cannot be collected "after the fact," whether it takes place a few months after an expense is incurred or later, when you are audited by the IRS. This article reviews some of those deductions for which the IRS requires you to generate certain records either contemporaneously as the expense is being incurred, or at least no later than when you file your return. We also highlight several deductions for which contemporaneous documentation, although not strictly required, is extremely helpful in making your case before the IRS on an audit.

Everybody knows that tax deductions aren’t allowed without proof in the form of documentation.  What records are needed to “prove it” to the IRS vary depending upon the type of deduction that you may want to claim.  Some documentation cannot be collected “after the fact,” whether it takes place a few months after an expense is incurred or later, when you are audited by the IRS.  This article reviews some of those deductions for which the IRS requires you to generate certain records either contemporaneously as the expense is being incurred, or at least no later than when you file your return.  We also highlight several deductions for which contemporaneous documentation, although not strictly required, is extremely helpful in making your case before the IRS on an audit.

Charitable contributions.  For cash contributions (including checks and other monetary gifts), the donor must retain a bank record or a written acknowledgment from the charitable organization. A cash contribution of $250 or more must be substantiated with a contemporaneous written acknowledgment from the donee.  “Contemporaneous” for this purpose is defined as obtaining an acknowledgment before you file your return.  So save those letters from the charity, especially for your larger donations.

Tip records.  A taxpayer receiving tips must keep an accurate and contemporaneous record of the tip income.  Employees receiving tips must also report the correct amount to their employers.  The necessary record can be in the form of a diary, log or worksheet and should be made at or near the time the income is received.

Wagering losses.  Gamblers need to substantiate their losses. The IRS usually accepts a regularly maintained diary or similar record (such as summary records and loss schedules) as adequate substantiation, provided it is supplemented by verifiable documentation.  The diary should identify the gambling establishment and the date and type of wager, as well as amounts won and lost. Verifiable documentation can include wagering tickets, canceled checks, credit card records, and withdrawal slips from banks.

Vehicle mileage log.  A taxpayer can deduct a standard mileage rate for business, charitable or medical use of a vehicle.  If the car is also used for personal purposes, the taxpayer should keep a contemporaneous mileage log, especially for business use.  If the taxpayer wants to deduct actual expenses for business use of a car also used for personal purposes, the taxpayer has to allocate costs between the business and personal use, based on miles driven for each.

Material participation in business activity.  Taxpayers that materially participate in a business generally can deduct business losses against other income.  Otherwise, they can only deduct losses against passive income.  An individual’s participation in an activity may be established by any reasonable means.  Contemporaneous time reports, logs, or similar documents are not required but can be particularly helpful to document material participation.  To identify services performed and the hours spent on the services, records may be established using appointment books, calendars, or narrative summaries.

Hobby loss.  Taxpayers who do not engage conduct an activity with a sufficient profit motive may be considered to engage in a hobby and will not be able to deduct losses from the activity against other income.  Maintaining accurate books and records can itself be an indication of a profit motive.  Moreover, the time and activities devoted to a particular business can be essential to demonstrate that the business has a profit motive.  Contemporaneous records can be an important indicator.

Travel and entertainment.  Expenses for travel and entertainment are subject to strict substantiation requirements. Taxpayers should maintain records of the amount spent, the time and place of the activity, its business purpose, and the business relationship of the person being entertained. Contemporaneous records are particularly helpful.